What is the average age of someone dying

Please do not hesitate to contact me. Additional Information. Death rate covers the number of deaths per , of population. State of Health. Death rate for suicide in the U. This feature is limited to our corporate solutions. Please contact us to get started with full access to dossiers, forecasts, studies and international data. Skip to main content Try our corporate solution for free!

Single Accounts Corporate Solutions Universities. In the United States in , the death rate was highest among those aged 85 and over, with about 15, men and 12, women per , of the population passing away. For all ages, the death rate was at The death rate Death rates generally are counted as the number of deaths per 1, or , of the population and include both deaths of natural and unnatural causes.

The death rate in the United States has pretty much held steady since While the birth rate in the United States has been decreasing, it is currently higher than the death rate. Causes of death There are a myriad number of causes of death in the United States , but the most recent data shows the top three leading causes of death to be heart disease, cancer, and accidents.

Heart disease was also the leading cause of death worldwide. Show source. Download for free You need to log in to download this statistic Register for free Already a member? Log in. And all the countries of the world are ordered along the x-axis ascending by the life expectancy of the population. On the y-axis you see the life expectancy of each country. For red line you see that the countries on the left — India and also South Korea — have a life expectancy around On the very right you see that in no country had a life expectancy above 40 Belgium had the highest life expectancy with just 40 years.

In the life expectancy of all countries was higher than in and the richer countries in Europe and North America had life expectancies over 60 years — over the course of modernization and industrialization the health of the population improved dramatically.

Therefore the world in was highly unequal in living standards — clearly devided between developed countries and developing countries. This division is ending: Look at the change between and ! Now it is the former developing countries — the countries that were worst off in — that achieved the fastest progress.

While some countries mostly in Africa are lacking behind. But many of the former developing countries have caught up and we achieved a dramatic reduction of global health inequality. The world developed from equally poor health in to great inequality in and back to more equality today — but equality on a much higher level. How to read the following graph: On the x-axis you find the cumulative share of the world population. The countries are ordered along the x-axis ascending by the life expectancy of the population.

Once past childhood, people would be expected to enjoy the same length of life as they did centuries ago. This, as we will see in the data below, is untrue. Life expectancy has increased at all ages. The average person can expect to live a longer life than in the past, irrespective of what age they are.

The red line shows the life expectancy for a newborn. Until the midth century a newborn could expect to live around 40 years. At times, even less. The rainbow-colored lines show how long a person could expect to live once they had reached that given, older, age. The light green line, for example, represents the life expectancy for children who had reached age The most striking development we see is the dramatic increase in life expectancy since the midth century.

Life expectancy at birth doubled from around 40 years to more than 81 years. While England and Wales are not the only region that achieved this improvement, the last years are the only time that humanity achieved anything like this.

The evidence that we have for population health before modern times suggest that around a quarter of all infants died in the first year of life and almost half died before they reached the end of puberty see here and there was no trend for life expectancy before the modern improvement in health: In the centuries preceding this chart, life expectancy fluctuated between 30 and 40 years with no marked increase ever.

Mortality rates declined, and consequently life expectancy increased, for all age groups. Child mortality is defined as the share of children who die before reaching their 5th birthday. We therefore have to look at the life expectancy of a five-year-old to see how mortality changed without taking child mortality into account.

This is shown by the yellow line. In a five-year-old could expect to live 55 years. Today a five-year-old can expect to live 82 years. An increase of 27 years. The same is true for any higher age cut-off. A year-old, for example, could once expect to live up to the age of Today, a year-old can expect to live to the age of A gain of 13 years.

This is true for countries around the world. Here is the data for the life expectancy of year-olds around the world. A second striking feature of this visualization is the big decline of life expectancy in It was caused by a very large global influenza epidemic, the Spanish flu pandemic. Yes, the decline of child mortality matters a lot for life expectancy. As we have seen here it was not only children that benefited from this progress, but people at all ages.

The chart here plots the survival curves for individuals in England and Wales from up to As we can see, less than half of the people born in the midth century made it past their 50th birthday. Life expectancy estimates only describe averages, these curves therefore provide an important complementary view and help us understand how the inequality of life lengths has changed over time.

In the 19th century the inequality was very large, many died at a very young age and a considerable number of people died between the age of 5 and Today the inequality is much lower, the huge majority survives the first 60 or 70 years of their life and the span at which most people die is much more compressed than it was years ago. Related chart: Deaths by age group in England and Wales. Related chart: Share that is expected to survive to the age of 65, by sex.

The following visualization shows the estimates and UN-projections of the remaining expected life years for year-olds. The rise — best visible on the Map-view — shows that the increasing life expectancy is not only due to declining child mortality , but that mortality rates at higher ages also declined globally.

In this chart we see the breakdown of deaths by age bracket. Globally fewer and fewer people die at a young age. The age at which people die has changed significantly since Fewer people die at a young age. In nearly one-quarter of all deaths were in children younger than 5. In contrast, the share of deaths in the overs age bracket has increased from a third to half of all deaths over this period. It is possible to change this chart to any other country or region in the world.

In countries with good health the share dying at a young age is very low. The inequality in years of life between people within the same country can be measured in the same way that we measure, for example, the inequality in the distribution of incomes. The following visualization presents estimates of the inequality of lifetimes as measured by the Gini coefficient.

A high Gini coefficient here means a very unequal distribution of years of life — that is, large within-country inequalities of the number of years that people live.

These estimates are from Peltzman 9 , where you can find more details regarding the underlying sources and estimation methodology. As can be seen in the chart, inequality in health outcomes has fallen strongly within many countries. In every country the life expectancy of women is higher than the life expectancy of men as this chart shows.

Why this is the case is answered by Esteban Ortiz-Ospina in his text Why do women live longer than men? As prior visualizations in this entry have shown, life expectancy has been rising globally. This breakdown in shown in this chart.

It is true that there has been an increase for most countries in both aspects. Healthy life expectancy has increased across the world in some countries, significantly in recent decades. It is also true that improved healthcare and treatments have also increased the number of years, on average, in which people live with a given disease burden or disability. This increase has, in most cases, been slower than the increase of healthy life expectancy.

The map shows the expected years lived with disability across the world. In general, we tend to see that higher-income countries tend to spend more years with disability or disease burden than at lower incomes around years versus years at lower incomes. The scatter plot shows that in countries where the life expectancy is highest the expected years lived with disability or disease tend to be the longest too.

These maps show how the world population is aging;the median age is increasing around the world. However, there are considerable differences between world regions — many parts of sub-Saharan Africa are much younger since both birth rates and mortality are higher. Many aspects had to change for life expectancy to double.

It is helpful therefore to read our entries on all the many causes of death, from infectious diseases like smallpox and malaria to non-communicable diseases like cancer. Not just specific medical innovations, like vaccinations or antibiotics, were necessary, but also public health interventions — improved public sanitation and publicly funded healthcare — were crucial. Below we are looking at several aspects, but this section is not yet complete and we will work on it in the future. One of the most important inputs to health is health care.

Here we study cross-country evidence of the link between aggregate healthcare consumption and production, and health outcomes. One common way of measuring national healthcare consumption and production is to estimate aggregate expenditure on healthcare typically expressed as a share of national income. This visualization shows the cross-country relationship between life expectancy at birth and healthcare expenditure per capita.

The chart shows the level of both measures at two points in time, about a generation apart and respectively. The arrows connect these two observations, thereby showing the change over time of both measures for all countries in the world. As it can be seen, countries with higher expenditure on healthcare per person tend to have a higher life expectancy. And looking at the change over time, we see that as countries spend more on health, life expectancy of the population increases.

This means the proportional highest gains are achieved in poor countries with low baseline levels of spending. This pattern is similar to that observed between life expectancy and per capita income. The countries are color-coded by world region, as per the inserted legends. Many of the green countries Sub-Saharan Africa achieved remarkable progress over the last 2 decades: health spending often increased substantially and life expectancy in many African countries increased by more than 10 years.

The most extreme case is Rwanda, where life expectancy has increased from 32 to 64 years since — which was one year after the Rwandan genocide. The two most populous countries of the world — India and China — are emphasized by larger arrows. It is interesting to see that in China achieved already relatively good health outcomes at comparatively low levels of health spending.

The association between health spending and increasing life expectancy also holds for rich countries in Europe, Asia, and North America in the upper right corner of the chart. The US is an outlier that achieves only a comparatively short life expectancy considering the fact that the country has by far the highest health expenditure of any country in the world. In this chart we see the relationship between years lived with disability or disease burden versus average per capita health expenditure.

Here we see a positive correlation whereby countries with higher healthcare expenditure tend to live more years with disability or disease burden. On average, US women are even 5. The world average age of death instead, is a few years lower at Within the European Union , these are The table shows the official data from the year In some minor cases, no data of this year are known, so that the previously published data were used.

Republic